The philosopher Martin Heidenberg’s reputation was tarnished for his association with Nazism. However, one of the concepts which he popularised was the concept of being ‘thrown into the world’. Among the many aspects of the world that we are thrown into, one is acquiring an education. Given the vast inequalities in society, education remains a privilege which few enjoy to its fullest. Therein lies a great contradiction in how to approach education. Consider it a fundamental right and distribute it like food grains to the hungry, irrespective of whether the food is palatable or not? Or let young adults choose whether they want to pursue education or take their time to figure out what they want?
As
a teacher in a mid-ranking undergraduate college in Kolkata, I roam past the
empty classrooms and corridors. The experience is not unique across the vast
education landscape of India. I hear young schoolboys discussing in my swimming
pool changing room that ten percent of their class turns up on Saturdays. I
hear computer science professors in the top-ranked state university in India
discussing the ten percent attendance in the fourth year of undergraduate
studies. I read online posts made by students of one of the top-ranked private
engineering institutes in India that since students who study there did not
make it to the IITs and that they pay hefty course fees, the institute takes a
lenient view of student attendance. As an examiner of undergraduate answer
scripts, I often serve as the head examiner of exams in which eighty percent of
the students fail to pass, which would not have been the case had these
students actually turned up and listened to what the teacher was saying. As an
invigilator, I am often surprised at the end of my invigilation period when I
see that the attendance sheet is only half full.
What
causes this disinterest in studies? When I was an undergraduate student at the
top-ranked English department in India, attendance was more than eighty percent
in all classes. What ticked for my classmates back then which students fail to
find in their classes nowadays?
Galileo’s
idea of inertia may be useful as a metaphor over here. Some of my work
colleagues who are new parents talk about the excitement that their children
felt on initially going to school but they felt disenchanted soon after. As
colleagues who are also parents, they speak about the anguish that they feel
over their children’s educational progress, and that the career trajectory that
they foresee for themselves in their school years is not how it turns out later
in life.
Being
thrown into the world, we are thrown into the educational system and thereafter
the inertia of motion continues till we complete our studies and start looking
for a job. This inexorable motion of the educational process frowns upon pauses
and breaks. University admissions often accept applications from students who
have graduated within the two preceding years. Gap years are considered a sign
of waywardness. In the employment circuit, we are often asked to explain our
career breaks and it is often seen as one more reason to reject an applicant.
The
Finnish public school education system since the 1990s has been well-lauded
(and taken out of its context and tried to be copied in India, most egregiously
by extremely expensive private schools, thereby rendering it nonsensical). The
Irish gap year system since the mid-1990s has been less well-lauded and copied
across the world. In Ireland, there is a gap year between what is class ten and
class eleven in India. In my opinion, there should at least be two gap years,
one between class ten and eleven, and one between class twelve and choosing to
apply for higher education.
If
we look at the ‘Education Statistics at a Glance’ report which used to be brought
out by the Indian ministry of education (when it was called the HRD ministry),
we will realise that the gross enrolment ratio does not decline gradually
throughout. There are sharp drop-offs after class ten and after class twelve. The
school meal programme ends after class eight. Some students and families decide
they have had enough. Given the mismatch in skills required for jobs and the education
imparted in schools and universities, unemployment and more importantly under-employment
(working in jobs which require a far lower skill-level than the ones which
people possess) are rife in India. Official statistics about how happy the
population is and how low unemployment is tell a story which the story tellers
echo but few read or listen and fewer believe in.
The
new education policy envisages a dropping in and joining in mechanism with an
academic bank of credit. Yet, the admission policies of universities often do
not even encourage many years of gaps, let alone having got their heads around
the new policy.
What
could a student do in a gap year? Is it an incentive to roll back the gross
enrolment ratio? Quantity over quality may be the story of modern India’s
growth trajectory. In gap years, the privileged
and the self-motivated can learn various skills and explore many aspects
without the pressure of being assessed. For the less privileged, it may mean the
lack of access to a safe space outside the dangers, if any, of the home. On the
other hand, if there is a high rate of absenteeism, despite the school space,
it may mean that it is not enough to attract the student. Peer groups often
dictate our life choices. Juvenile criminals are often those who spend time
outside the school. Hanging out with such groups, instead of being in school,
pre-disposes one to pick up their ill habits.
Despite
the 1968 Kothari’s commission’s six percent GDP spending on education never
seeing the light of day even after more than half a century passing by, a
little more spending would ensure the relevance of the school in the gap year
and retaining the school’s association with the students. Teachers usually know
a few things beyond their subjects. Learning to ride a bicycle, learning to
swim, learning to cook, learning to sew, learning music, theatre, painting,
sports, dance, taking one’s own sweet time to actually re-read the textbooks of
earlier classes and learn the concepts in greater detail than when one barely
managed to pass by finding out the quickest route to ace past the standard
questions – all these activities can be performed without hiring extra
teachers, if teachers are allowed to come up with their own programmes which
they can teach students in the gap year and students have the opportunity to
choose to learn all this at either their school or at an accredited non-governmental
organisation which may be reimbursed for imparting the skills. It may go a long
way in training and providing a sense of direction to young minds. One of the
pitfalls of a heavily centralised model is that it leaves little room for
individual endeavour. The Irish transition year system is voluntary, though
supposedly ninety-nine percent schools offer it and eighty percent students opt
for it. With the commodification of education happening worldwide, the Irish
system has degenerated and deviated from its original plan. The gap year
activities have also been seen by parents and students as activities to bump up
the CV rather than learn about oneself and the world.
In
India, a gap year may prove to young minds that the world is not their oyster.
Their aspirations and their skills may meet earlier than they do so now. They
may also find some breathing space in the world that we are thrown into and get
rid of some of the heartbreak they find themselves in later on in life when
they rue the educational path that they embarked on many years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment